Boudewijn de Haan

Managing Director Equities

Lennart Frijns

Managing Director Equities

How does the strategy align with Anthos’ values?

The ethos which drives the strategy and what we look for in underlying managers is: good performance, at reasonable costs, with strong ESG credentials. All the managers and strategies within the equities strategy follow this ethos. All managers are PRI signatories, all score as either ‘Professional’ or ‘Leader’ using our ESG and IMP scorecard, and several funds are generating measurable and positive impact on society and the world.


One of the best ways to demonstrate this is with the carbon emissions footprint of the strategy, which is consistently lower than the benchmark with 2022 as no exception. When measured against Anthos’ net-zero ambition pathway, the team’s climate-conscious decisions mean that, so far, we are cautiously on track to achieve our ambition for net-zero emissions by 2040. These results show how the equity portfolios align with our value of sustainability.


For our value of human dignity, we made strides in 2022 by collaborating with underlying managers we consider leaders in human rights to help us develop our understanding and approach at Anthos. Being able to ask for guidance and bringing that expertise into our ecosystem is one of the advantages we think of selecting and backing the best managers globally when it comes to ESG.


What were your greatest responsible investment challenges in 2022?

2022 was a year that saw energy prices soar, and this impacted our portfolios which have a strong ESG tilt and are typically underweight fossil fuel companies (as shown with our emissions). It was also a year where value outperformed growth, and managers with strong ESG credentials typically have a strong quality growth tilt as we did in 2022.


To address this, we took the following actions: we sought to add diversification by adding a quantitative value manager to counteract the growth tilt, we sought and selected a new manager with exposure to listed real estate to counteract inflation pressures and provide decent yields, and we engaged with our existing managers regularly to challenge their tactical decisions and risk mitigation in order to protect capital during this difficult environment.


Whilst we try not to assess either financial of ESG performance in short periods, we recognise 2022 as a challenging year for our portfolios and the broader sustainable movement. Despite that, we strongly believe our investment philosophy is future proof and reflective of the structural and sustainable trajectory the world is on. From the bottom-up, we will continue to seek out the leaders of that trajectory and from the top-down we continue to take comfort in the forces driving sustainability across all parts of the economic system.


Describe the opportunities for responsible investment for your portfolio?

We have invested in ESG funds since before it became mainstream, having seed funded several leading equities impact strategies which align with such frameworks as the SDGs and the Paris Agreement. 


From 2022, there are now several strategies that fit that description, providing our investors with exposure to such themes as: green energy, healthcare, education, listed real estate, circular economy businesses and resource-efficiency. To mitigate financial risk from being too exposed to quality growth companies, we balance the exposure with contrasting managers such as quantitative value. 

Over time, we intend to grow the portion of assets allocated to sustainable funds as the market grows better at pricing sustainability into valuations. We will always balance that goal with our number one priority which is to generate risk-adjusted financial returns for our clients.


Assess how the ESG and IMP assessments have changed from last year?

The entire portfolio is allocated to funds and managers that score as ‘Leaders’ and ‘Professionals.’ These high scores are consistent year after year given seeking out ESG leaders is a core part of our strategy. From 2021, you will see a slight decrease in leaders and increase in professionals due to tactical decisions to add more balance to the portfolios but we should expect swings like this in the challenging market environment.


For the IMP scores, like last year there were no funds that ‘may or do’ cause harm. The allocation to funds that ‘act to avoid harm’ increased from 82 to 82.7% this year, to funds that ‘benefit stakeholders’ decreased from 5.7% to 2.1%, and to funds that ‘contribute to solutions’ increased from 7.8% to 10.7%. Whilst we are pleased with these numbers, it’s important to stress that they are just one indicator of sustainability performance and do not take into account the importance of financial performance.


Moving forward, our focus is to continue engaging with all our managers to demonstrate progress on their sustainability ambitions whilst at the same time putting as much importance on generating long-lasting financial value.

ESG and IMP assessments


O

ESG assessment

Leader

87.51%

Professional

12.49%

Novice

0.00%

Laggard

0.00%


O

IMP assessment

Contribute to solutions

10.65%

Benefit stakeholders

2.13%

Act to avoid harm

87.22%

May/Does cause harm

0.00%

Total carbon emissions (Scope 1 + 2)

tCO₂e­

Economic intensity

tCO₂e/€m invested­

Benchmark

Anthos equity

Carbon metrics ©2022 MSCI ESG Research LLC. Reproduced by permission.

Benchmark: MSCI World ACWI


Next page

Fixed income